Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 0:57:57 GMT -5
The Superior Labor Court considered that the continuity of a company's activities by former employees organized in the form of a cooperative does not constitute a succession of employers. The decision was made by the th Panel of the Superior Labor Court, which analyzed a case involving Jorgraf (Cooperative of Journalists and Graphics), made up of former employees of ETN Editora Tribuna de Notícias Ltda., from Alagoas. The ministers considered that there was no transfer of the company's enterprise, assets and facilities to the cooperative, which therefore cannot be held responsible for the publisher's labor debts.
Judge Marcia Cunha Silva Araújo de Carvalho, from the nd Business Court of Rio de Janeiro, declared herself unable to judge a case involving Opportunity, owned by banker Daniel Dantas. The bank takes action against the company News Opportunity Publicidade for using its name. The information comes from Lauro Jardim's column, from Veja.
“I express my suspicion due to serious incidents that occurred BTC Number Data between me and the business group to which the author belongs”, declared the judge, according to the process on the TJ-RJ website.
Marcia won the right to receive, in , compensation of R$, for moral damages from the Opportunity group. At the time, Daniel Dantas' group accused the judge of being biased and having defamed the institution in statements to the press. In , Marcia suspended an agreement between Opportunity and the Citibank group in the dispute for controlling interest in Brasil Telecom.
The rapporteur, minister Brito Pereira, understood that the cooperative had even acted illegally in occupying the publishing house's location. In his vote, the minister stated that the simple continuation of business activity by former employees resulted from the need to guarantee their own survival.
The Regional Labor Court of the th Region (AL) had already denied the appeal filed by the ETN partner. The intention was to be excluded from the conviction that recognized him as a hidden or de facto partner of the publisher and, therefore, also responsible for labor debts in an action filed by a newspaper seller.
By appealing to the Superior Labor Court, the partner intended to see the succession of employers configured by the cooperative formed by former employees of the publisher and, thus, pass all responsibility for existing labor debts to it. The decision was unanimous to dismiss the partner's appeal. With information from the TST Press Office.
Judge Marcia Cunha Silva Araújo de Carvalho, from the nd Business Court of Rio de Janeiro, declared herself unable to judge a case involving Opportunity, owned by banker Daniel Dantas. The bank takes action against the company News Opportunity Publicidade for using its name. The information comes from Lauro Jardim's column, from Veja.
“I express my suspicion due to serious incidents that occurred BTC Number Data between me and the business group to which the author belongs”, declared the judge, according to the process on the TJ-RJ website.
Marcia won the right to receive, in , compensation of R$, for moral damages from the Opportunity group. At the time, Daniel Dantas' group accused the judge of being biased and having defamed the institution in statements to the press. In , Marcia suspended an agreement between Opportunity and the Citibank group in the dispute for controlling interest in Brasil Telecom.
The rapporteur, minister Brito Pereira, understood that the cooperative had even acted illegally in occupying the publishing house's location. In his vote, the minister stated that the simple continuation of business activity by former employees resulted from the need to guarantee their own survival.
The Regional Labor Court of the th Region (AL) had already denied the appeal filed by the ETN partner. The intention was to be excluded from the conviction that recognized him as a hidden or de facto partner of the publisher and, therefore, also responsible for labor debts in an action filed by a newspaper seller.
By appealing to the Superior Labor Court, the partner intended to see the succession of employers configured by the cooperative formed by former employees of the publisher and, thus, pass all responsibility for existing labor debts to it. The decision was unanimous to dismiss the partner's appeal. With information from the TST Press Office.